3 ms·
Yes, mis-typed when I typed purely functional. My intent was to lean closer towards mostly-functional languages than languages which _can_ be written in a funct
by deedubaya 9y ago
Yes, mis-typed when I typed purely functional. My intent was to lean closer towards mostly-functional languages than languages which _can_ be written in a functional style (a la JS or Ruby).
I should know better than to use the word "pure" on the internet, someone will always correct how inaccurate my usage is :)