3 ms·
I entirely agree with you about the value of maintaining diversity but Iv was pretty much pointing out that Esperanto was vetoed in order to prevent an increase
by lucozade 9y ago
I entirely agree with you about the value of maintaining diversity but Iv was pretty much pointing out that Esperanto was vetoed in order to prevent an increase in diversity. French was the diplomatic lingua franca and the French delegates were working very hard to maintain that.
English is now the lingua franca in many fields due to US hegemony as you say. Even though it's not due to any inherent virtue it's not, of itself, a bad thing. I'm not a big fan of Americanization (sic) but that's a slightly different thing from a common means of communication. The latter may well mean we have to suffer some of the former but I personally think it's worth it (don't tell my daughter I, like, said that OK?).
Obviously this will never happen but now would be great time for the EU to adopt English as a common tongue, precisely because of Brexit. It'd clearly not be because of a cultural dominance within the EU and it would save a ton of money and a lot of wasted effort. I await the response of the Académie française with bated breath.
- simias 9y agoYeah I agree with you. There's a difference between preserving diversity and trying to push your language down other people's throat. Clearly some of our laws and official posturing has more to do with the latter than the former. And obviously I won't oppose English becoming the language of the EU since the other obvious contender would be German and I can barely speak a lick of Deutsch!
- tormeh 9y agoAlso English is easier to learn than German. As a geographically spread-out language without central control all the bits that are hard to learn has gone away. The only problem is that it has accumulated a lot of crufty spelling and prononciation, but that's easier to fix than grammar.