Taxpayers cover the bill, police (and the corporate tenant) vindicated, they all move on and everything else pretty much stays the same? Maybe a better ending

Taxpayers cover the bill, police (and the corporate tenant) vindicated, they all move on and everything else pretty much stays the same? Maybe a better ending would move the needle at least slightly in favor of preventing this kind of thing in the future. Among several things that ought to happen in an ideal world, perhaps we could give non-lawyers clarity on what is a public or private space: If a corporate tenant wants to regulate a private space this way, it has to clearly separate it from the public with some specification of doors, gates, etc. Otherwise, it will be considered public in a conflict like this one.