2 ms·
Agreed, though that would require a lossless format (e.g. png) and would limit exchanges to sources that don't change the image (e.g.as email attachment) but no
by wolframhempel 9y ago
Agreed, though that would require a lossless format (e.g. png) and would limit exchanges to sources that don't change the image (e.g.as email attachment) but not social networks that resize or otherwise reprocess the image
- anfractuosity 9y agoYou don't have to use a lossless format for steganography, for example: 'Statistically Undetectable JPEG Steganography: Dead Ends, Challenges, and Opportunities' http://dde.binghamton.edu/tomas/pdfs/Pev07-ACM.pdf http://dde.binghamton.edu/tomas/pdfs/Pev07-ACM.pdf