3 ms·
Without a doubt the business news has a greater interest in delivery of facts on the ground than your typical national newspaper. To that end I pay for (and on
by mancerayder 9y ago
Without a doubt the business news has a greater interest in delivery of facts on the ground than your typical national newspaper. To that end I pay for (and only pay for) the Financial Times due to their attempt to seek out truth. For example, on controversial issues they'll have editorials from both sides, long articles, and they publish letters criticizing and correcting articles. As it's investment-minded and British owned, there's more of an international focus.
The sad thing about the FT is how expensive it is.
Investors tend to care about facts more than feelings, so objectivity becomes a worthwhile pursuit. When you're investing in a commodity, foreign currency and so forth, you're going to read everything with squinted eyes, looking for the facts.
- richev 9y ago> The sad thing about the FT is how expensive it is. Real journalism costs money, and ad revenues aren't what they used to be.
- colejohnson66 9y agoPartly because of ad blockers. But ad blockers became popular due to the rise in obnoxious ads. It’s an endless cycle that advertisers and publishers aren’t working at all to fix.