9 ms·
Yeah. I doubt that their machine can "imagine no possessions", or that it would have much utility even if it could.
by ajarmst 9y ago
Yeah. I doubt that their machine can "imagine no possessions", or that it would have much utility even if it could.
- landon32 9y agoYou're right, but I think this paper is the first step on a (potentially very, very) very long road to building machines that could "imagine no possessions"