In the end, the article reads as an advertisement for the union they're joining. That's probably the general purpose of the article anyway. That said, it does

In the end, the article reads as an advertisement for the union they're joining. That's probably the general purpose of the article anyway. That said, it does drive home the overall point that "inequality" is a very complicated issue, and for all the good PR that Facebook and Zuckerberg have, they're just as guilty, inasmuch as there is any real guilt to assign. Facebook certainly has the money, and if they do indeed care about wealth inequality, they would do well to start at their own doorstep. So this worker is a contractor. So what? Very convenient; result still stands.