Not many, even though I had the opportunity to do so multiple times, I chose (and still choose) not to work those kind of times. > I genuinely cannot understan

Not many, even though I had the opportunity to do so multiple times, I chose (and still choose) not to work those kind of times. > I genuinely cannot understand your argument in favour of 60 hour weeks. This phrase implies that you are comparing mandatory 40-hours to mandatory 60-hours, which is not the line of argumentation. The line of questioning is that people should be forced to never work 60 hours. It is a proposal of restriction, with the argument that the lives of workers would be better if so. And I argue that is not true.