4 ms·

Looks great! One thing that would be nice would be the ability for Raneto to act as a static Docs generator. Looks like you have to use nodejs as the server as

by drew-y 9y ago

Looks great! One thing that would be nice would be the ability for Raneto to act as a static Docs generator. Looks like you have to use nodejs as the server as it stands. I'd like to be able to use a simple static http-server.

adammenges 9y ago
Yeah that be a great addition
aizatto 9y ago
I've been using Phenomic https://phenomic.io https://phenomic.io for my personal site https://www.aizatto.com https://www.aizatto.com
- carussell 9y ago
  It looks like something that could be handled just as well using Heckle by Marijn Haverbeke. It reads content and layouts from a Jekyll-like directory structure. Naturally, it uses CodeMirror for syntax highlighting. http://marijnhaverbeke.nl/blog/heckle.html http://marijnhaverbeke.nl/blog/heckle.html
- michaelmior 9y ago
  There are loads of options for static site generators (here[0] is a good list of ~200), but it doesn't solve all problems. One question, for example, is how to get search functionality. [0] https://www.staticgen.com/ https://www.staticgen.com/
rfrank 9y ago
Hugo with a theme like docdock is pretty neat (http://gohugo.io/ http://gohugo.io/ & http://docdock.netlify.com/ http://docdock.netlify.com/)
- bedros 9y ago
  how would you add a new post (for a blog) edit a file, and upload it to the site?
  - reificator 9y ago
    What works for me with Hugo (because I'm already using these tools all day anyway) is to keep the site in a Github repository. Then when I make a change it triggers TravisCI to do a full site rebuild. (Takes longer to install Hugo than to actually run it) Then once it's built, Travis has built in support for uploading to S3, and away we go. Doesn't work for everyone, but it's really smooth and simple for me, I can even just go to Github, create a new page, and save it right there from the site. Which means I can edit from any device I want.
  - bdot 9y ago
    Netlify CMS can be a good choice if you are looking for admin section, it nicely integrates with GitHub.

by drew-y 9y ago

adammenges 9y ago

Yeah that be a great addition

aizatto 9y ago

I've been using Phenomic https://phenomic.io https://phenomic.io for my personal site https://www.aizatto.com https://www.aizatto.com

carussell 9y ago
It looks like something that could be handled just as well using Heckle by Marijn Haverbeke. It reads content and layouts from a Jekyll-like directory structure. Naturally, it uses CodeMirror for syntax highlighting. http://marijnhaverbeke.nl/blog/heckle.html http://marijnhaverbeke.nl/blog/heckle.html
michaelmior 9y ago
There are loads of options for static site generators (here[0] is a good list of ~200), but it doesn't solve all problems. One question, for example, is how to get search functionality. [0] https://www.staticgen.com/ https://www.staticgen.com/

rfrank 9y ago

Hugo with a theme like docdock is pretty neat (http://gohugo.io/ http://gohugo.io/ & http://docdock.netlify.com/ http://docdock.netlify.com/)

bedros 9y ago
how would you add a new post (for a blog) edit a file, and upload it to the site?
- reificator 9y ago
  What works for me with Hugo (because I'm already using these tools all day anyway) is to keep the site in a Github repository. Then when I make a change it triggers TravisCI to do a full site rebuild. (Takes longer to install Hugo than to actually run it) Then once it's built, Travis has built in support for uploading to S3, and away we go. Doesn't work for everyone, but it's really smooth and simple for me, I can even just go to Github, create a new page, and save it right there from the site. Which means I can edit from any device I want.
- bdot 9y ago
  Netlify CMS can be a good choice if you are looking for admin section, it nicely integrates with GitHub.