3 ms·
The 'cost of living trap' is due far more to a growing amount of wages (good!) chasing after an essentially-capped housing supply near those jobs. When well-pay
by akgerber 9y ago
The 'cost of living trap' is due far more to a growing amount of wages (good!) chasing after an essentially-capped housing supply near those jobs. When well-paying manufacturing jobs boomed in Detroit during the 1910s auto boom, its population doubled in a decade, and increased by 50% in the following decade— but its housing stock grew to match!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit#Demographics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit#Demographics
On the other hand, the population of Menlo Park has increased around 10% in the midst of a world-historical boom:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menlo_Park,_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menlo_Park,_California
And neighboring Atherton is still well below its peak population:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherton,_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherton,_California
This is because they've zoned out pretty much all new apartment, or even sometimes 2-story house, construction.
So instead more and more of those rising wages chase after the same houses.
- eropple 9y agoI am aware of everything you are citing. City policy should change. At the same time, the corporate interests that are triggering this should have the social conscience to seek alternate solutions rather than straining the public good to its breaking point. Corporations exist to serve society, not the other way around, and bad actors should be treated as such.
- pxeboot 9y agoAren't the high wages already a response to the high cost of living? If cheaper housing was available, what would stop wages from (slowly) going down?
- austenallred 9y agoCompetition for talent