4 ms·
By purchasing the ticket, he was confirming the vulnerability. I am sure he knew that they would cancel the ticket when he reported it. I don't find any wrong d
by nithinm 9y ago
By purchasing the ticket, he was confirming the vulnerability. I am sure he knew that they would cancel the ticket when he reported it. I don't find any wrong doing here.
- StreamBright 9y agoAnd you think that this is going to be enough at the court? Have a look at this list, many of them thought they are not doing anything wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_criminals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_criminals The point is that we live by the law, not how you feel about a certain action. I agree that the law is a bit problematic but regardless we cannot cherrypick which law to follow and which not.
- bigbugbag 9y agoThe point being that he should not have been sent to court here, yet they chose to do so anyways.
- kowdermeister 9y agoYes, that should be enough. You won't get into any trouble if you break a window when the house is on fire. This time, the site was on fire.
- underyx 9y agoAlso, since he doesn't live in Budapest, it should be obvious he wouldn't be doing it for personal gain — he has no way to use the pass anyway, after all.