You and author are spinning in circles as is typical in this discussion. In his post he characterized what you wrote as the sort of thing proponents of the "sex

You and author are spinning in circles as is typical in this discussion. In his post he characterized what you wrote as the sort of thing proponents of the "sexism-is-the-cause-for-no-women-in-STEM" theory would say. You characterized what he said as something a sexist proponent of "sexism-is-NOT-the-cause-for-no-women-in-STEM" theory would say. But here's the crux of his argument that is never answered honestly: >Is it possible that something other than discrimination is a main source of gender gaps in STEM? And I think it's clear that the answer is YES! So what are we talking about here?