4 ms·
Very surprised by the ubiquity of JS in non-web libraries/frameworks. I know it's a well-played fiddle, but it's saying something damning about our ability to p
by ivanbakel 9y ago
Very surprised by the ubiquity of JS in non-web libraries/frameworks. I know it's a well-played fiddle, but it's saying something damning about our ability to put together quick and easy applications with other languages - or maybe just the number of people who start with webdev - when JS becomes the first choice. Is it just a consequence of how much UI work has been put into HTML rendering engines?
- mattgreenrocks 9y agoAlso consider how beneficial it is from an employer's perspective to just force all UI to be HTML/JS, impedance mismatches be damned. Edit: another consideration is if HTML/JS is the standard UI, then it biases that generation of developers to favor that particular abstraction. Innovation is framed as, "look where we managed to cram HTML/JS!" Actual innovation, which would be more along the lines of, "here's a new paradigm/abstraction that replaces HTML/JS" is seen as eccentric and largely ignored. In effect, developers' over-attachment to the way things are done greatly slows forward progress. They're only able to recognize small, incremental improvements.
- TAForObvReasons 9y agoMany of the top items in the subset of JS Language and Non-web libraries/frameworks (moment, async, request, underscore/lodash, bluebird/q) might be included in the standard libraries of other languages. Also, a bunch of reasonably popular tools like rollup and systemjs may be miscategorized
- eeZah7Ux 9y agoJS is vastly overrepresented due to its popularity amongst some "hip" crowds and some small companies.