My point was that sometimes something may have a positive effect even if we don't understand why or where the positive effect comes from. We can't easily reprod

My point was that sometimes something may have a positive effect even if we don't understand why or where the positive effect comes from. We can't easily reproduce the positive effects of church because we don't know what about it, exactly, is responsible for the benefits. Similar to how a multivitamin and junk food doesn't replace a balanced diet. That's just an analogy to help illustrate my point, not a point on its own. I think it's more likely that churches will adapt to our modern understandings than someone will build the perfect atheist social institution from first principles.