3 ms·
This actually makes it super clear, thanks for expanding! What do you think about this: Based on what you've written, for companies that are married to Trello
by logicallee 9y ago
This actually makes it super clear, thanks for expanding!
What do you think about this:
Based on what you've written, for companies that are married to Trello it almost sounds like there should be a 'staging' board and a 'production' board where the process failures you allude to can happen on 'staging', but the devs really just see 'production' -- and as soon as stakeholders stop interfering for a while they start matching. :) Then the vigilant PM can move things over to production as they figure out wtf just got 'committed' to staging. (This sync and the fake access may require some kind of automation).
Thoughts? (I know this is off-hand. But in a way I kind of like the power of important people to directly fuck with a todo board. There are so many broken processes where unimportant things are worked on and important things get pushed into a backlog. I mean there's a reason the people you mentioned got the access to fuck up the board in the first place, isn't there?)
This is veering kind of off-topic and I do feel I understand your point very well now, so this is just kind of a hypothetical. Thanks for your answers.
- bshimmin 9y agoI think a Trello board for non-technical stakeholders to raise a load of stuff is probably a fine idea, and almost certainly better than hastily firing off emails that will disappear into a blackhole, as you mentioned earlier. As long as that board doesn't interfere with an actual development sprint board, I would be totally happy!
- logicallee 9y agoThanks for all your answers - this was interesting. :)