6 ms·

> Why do people seem to assume that those most capable of implementing the cryptography, networking, or other code are also those most capable of understanding

> Why do people seem to assume that those most capable of implementing the cryptography, networking, or other code are also those most capable of understanding the economics of cryptocurrencies or determining their future? I guess I'll give the blunt answer: many proponents of cryptocurrency have views on economics, politics, society, law, and contracts that are ignorant of the way those things really work. Many really do believe that currencies, transactions, and contracts can be implemented entirely by computer programs and that governments and courts should have no jurisdiction over such things. If you don't believe me, go to some of the active crypto forums and get involved in political discussions. You'll see an astounding mix of techno-utopianism, extreme libertarianism, and baseless conspiracy theories about fiat money and governments in general. The blockchain is an interesting technical achievement, and so are smart contracts, but they are not a replacement for laws and governments. Unfortunately, a lot of people think they are. Some people even insist that bitcoin doesn't have governance, but that's clearly not the case because the current controversy about the core developers is exactly about governance. I bring this up because these kinds of beliefs are the reason people in the bitcoin community think the programmers who implement bitcoin are capable of solving the economic problems -- they reject the idea that there are any economic or social problems facing bitcoin that can't be solved with the underlying technology. They don't accept that these are social problems with social solutions.

brightball 9y ago
I've never used bitcoin but one of the core appeals as I understood it was mathematically limited supply to create an inflation proof currency. There seem to be lots of fluctuations in the price but eventually it hit a point of relative stability (in theory at least) with value that increases slightly relative the rate that the dollar inflates. If that's the case then it certainly does the job. There are a lot of people out there who are very aware of how their saved money loses value and actively want an alternative that feels "safe". I don't know that Bitcoin is that alternative, but it's definitely trying to be and even I have to admit has been far more successful than I ever would have expected.
- twblalock 9y ago
  The cap on mining is actually a good example of an inflexible technical solution for a problem that is better solved through flexible governance. There are several problems with it: Inflation can be a good thing. It can be used to combat deflation, and the absence of inflation can lead to stagnation via the paradox of thrift. There are certain central bank policies that encourage inflation and are known to work pretty well, including QE, which was demonized by a lot of people but has now been proven an effective aid in the recovery from the 2008 crash. The bitcoin approach focuses on the money supply only, but there are other factors to inflation. There is general agreement among economists that the money supply is the key driver of inflation in the long term, but in the short term, other factors can be involved. Inflation is possible with a static supply of money, because the amount of money in circulation (versus the amount of money in savings accounts or bonds, or otherwise locked up) can change. Inflation can also happen even with a static supply of money and no changes in the amount of money in circulation. An example is an oil price shock, caused by an embargo: oil is an input into many manufacturing processes, as well as people's cars, so a general increase in the prices of goods and services can be expected. So, the bitcoin approach takes away some valuable monetary policy tools and it doesn't actually prevent inflation in the short term. People shouldn't believe that their bitcoins are protected from inflation.
  - trophycase 9y ago
    These solutions can literally all be programmed. There is almost no way Bitcoin maintains the 21 million static cap by the time the mining reward is gone
  - elmar 9y ago
    I have replied to a similar thread on HN recently here is the link. Inflation the Hidden Tax https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14828655 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14828655
    - mikeash 9y ago
      I don't understand what the big deal is there. I can understand it in a hyperinflation situation, but when inflation is ~2%, surely this hidden tax is insignificant compared to the more visible, explicit taxes?
honestlyreally 9y ago
> The blockchain is an interesting technical achievement, and so are smart contracts, but they are not a replacement for laws and governments. A lot of Venezuelans would disagree with you there. History clearly shows governments fail to act responisbly with currency. In the last 25 years, 21 countries experienced hyperinflation. What do you propose people in those counties do? Your comment was big on problems but offered no solutions. Cryptocurrencies are a solution for many. Take off the developed world rose tinted glasses for a moment and see that for a large majority of Earth's population their government and courts do not serve them well. And this is not just poor countries, a woman in Saudi Arabia cannot open a bank account without a mans permission. That same woman can create a bitcoin wallet in one minute.
- omarchowdhury 9y ago
  > And this is not just poor countries, a woman in Saudi Arabia cannot open a bank account without a mans permission. That same woman can create a bitcoin wallet in one minute. But when she needs to turn it back into fiat, guess what, she's going to need a bank account to receive the funds from the exchange.
  - flyingfences 9y ago
    > But when she needs to turn it back into fiat The whole idea is to create a new financial ecosystem that doesn't rely on old fiat currencies.

brightball 9y ago

I've never used bitcoin but one of the core appeals as I understood it was mathematically limited supply to create an inflation proof currency. There seem to be lots of fluctuations in the price but eventually it hit a point of relative stability (in theory at least) with value that increases slightly relative the rate that the dollar inflates. If that's the case then it certainly does the job. There are a lot of people out there who are very aware of how their saved money loses value and actively want an alternative that feels "safe". I don't know that Bitcoin is that alternative, but it's definitely trying to be and even I have to admit has been far more successful than I ever would have expected.

twblalock 9y ago
The cap on mining is actually a good example of an inflexible technical solution for a problem that is better solved through flexible governance. There are several problems with it: Inflation can be a good thing. It can be used to combat deflation, and the absence of inflation can lead to stagnation via the paradox of thrift. There are certain central bank policies that encourage inflation and are known to work pretty well, including QE, which was demonized by a lot of people but has now been proven an effective aid in the recovery from the 2008 crash. The bitcoin approach focuses on the money supply only, but there are other factors to inflation. There is general agreement among economists that the money supply is the key driver of inflation in the long term, but in the short term, other factors can be involved. Inflation is possible with a static supply of money, because the amount of money in circulation (versus the amount of money in savings accounts or bonds, or otherwise locked up) can change. Inflation can also happen even with a static supply of money and no changes in the amount of money in circulation. An example is an oil price shock, caused by an embargo: oil is an input into many manufacturing processes, as well as people's cars, so a general increase in the prices of goods and services can be expected. So, the bitcoin approach takes away some valuable monetary policy tools and it doesn't actually prevent inflation in the short term. People shouldn't believe that their bitcoins are protected from inflation.
- trophycase 9y ago
  These solutions can literally all be programmed. There is almost no way Bitcoin maintains the 21 million static cap by the time the mining reward is gone
- elmar 9y ago
  I have replied to a similar thread on HN recently here is the link. Inflation the Hidden Tax https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14828655 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14828655
  - mikeash 9y ago
    I don't understand what the big deal is there. I can understand it in a hyperinflation situation, but when inflation is ~2%, surely this hidden tax is insignificant compared to the more visible, explicit taxes?

honestlyreally 9y ago

> The blockchain is an interesting technical achievement, and so are smart contracts, but they are not a replacement for laws and governments. A lot of Venezuelans would disagree with you there. History clearly shows governments fail to act responisbly with currency. In the last 25 years, 21 countries experienced hyperinflation. What do you propose people in those counties do? Your comment was big on problems but offered no solutions. Cryptocurrencies are a solution for many. Take off the developed world rose tinted glasses for a moment and see that for a large majority of Earth's population their government and courts do not serve them well. And this is not just poor countries, a woman in Saudi Arabia cannot open a bank account without a mans permission. That same woman can create a bitcoin wallet in one minute.

omarchowdhury 9y ago
> And this is not just poor countries, a woman in Saudi Arabia cannot open a bank account without a mans permission. That same woman can create a bitcoin wallet in one minute. But when she needs to turn it back into fiat, guess what, she's going to need a bank account to receive the funds from the exchange.
- flyingfences 9y ago
  > But when she needs to turn it back into fiat The whole idea is to create a new financial ecosystem that doesn't rely on old fiat currencies.