3 ms·
My understanding of this was that basically we have achieved the scientific break even point already. That is we can have short lived fusion in a tokamak where
by IgorPartola 9y ago
My understanding of this was that basically we have achieved the scientific break even point already. That is we can have short lived fusion in a tokamak where we produce more energy than is consumed by the reaction. The trick is getting to practical break even: you also need to power the magnetic field.
It seems that we are getting closer with every attempt to getting to that break even, but it is very slow progress. I also remember reading something about an attempt at building a tokamak that didn't run continuously, but in short bursts. The idea was that it was more feasible to actually get closer to the break even that way.
Anyone have a quote in what our current best efficiency is?
- dave_sullivan 9y agoI saw this a while back and thought it was a good summary: https://youtube.com/watch?v=L0KuAx1COEk https://youtube.com/watch?v=L0KuAx1COEk I forget the current best efficiency, but it's getting close.