4 ms·
Not new. Seems like a repost. Also: "This article was originally published in our “Adaptation” issue in March, 2016." Someone is really pushing this guy's scie
by medymed 9y ago
Not new.
Seems like a repost. Also: "This article was originally published in our “Adaptation” issue in March, 2016." Someone is really pushing this guy's scientific (or literary) branding.
- boromi 9y agoYep. Some of the headlines are particularly egregious. https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=%22jeremy+england%22&qs=n&form=QBNT&sp=-1&pq=%22jeremy+england%22&sc=8-16&sk=&cvid=8252C82E770E48B68A879962307562BC https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=%22jeremy+england%22&qs=n... I suspect he is up for tenure review :P His proposals are not knew just spun differently. You can find critics from other physics/chemist regarding their suspicions as well.
- woodandsteel 9y ago> His proposals are not knew just spun differently. You can find critics from other physics/chemist regarding their suspicions as well. I have a rule that people shouldn't post negative comments without including specific arguments and/or links. You just violated that rule.
- rpedela 9y agoMarch 2016 is pretty new, and I am happy for the repost because I didn't see it the first time and it is a very interesting idea.
- mercer 9y agoQuite a few publications re-post older articles, and I vaguely recall Aeon doing so in the past (not 100%). That said, usually they're a bit older than a year or so.