> I'm not sure why people talk about Rust being safe when this sort of thing happens and it can't catch it at compile time. "Safe" as in "memory safe". Panicki

> I'm not sure why people talk about Rust being safe when this sort of thing happens and it can't catch it at compile time. "Safe" as in "memory safe". Panicking is better than allowing one to read into that memory. I would prefer panic-safe, but we might have to wait for a new dependently typed systems lang for that.