5 ms·
You're right, we shouldn't clean it up quickly and effectively because its getting worse. We should wait until all of the oil is in the ocean and then clean it
by anon-e-moose 16y ago
You're right, we shouldn't clean it up quickly and effectively because its getting worse. We should wait until all of the oil is in the ocean and then clean it up all at once! That's much more effective!
No, seriously, what is your point here. Also the oil companies can't tell the more effective oil clean up ships to come operate because of the mentioned government regulations and directions. Oops.
- mkramlich 16y agoOf course there should be a cleanup effort ongoing. But if new stuff continues to spill out every day afterward, there will be more to cleanup the next day, and the next, and the next, forever, until we reach the point where the leak is totally stopped and/or contained the source. It's weird/naive to criticize a cleanup effort that's been going on for months if the leak has also been leaking unstopped for those same number of months as well. It can never be totally cleaned up or restored until, at a bare minimum, the leak is stopped.
- anon-e-moose 16y agoAs much as possible should be done about both problems. This article puts forth the idea that we can and should be doing more to clean up what is already there. If the leak stopped tomorrow, should we deploy the largest possible oil cleaning ship? If the leak cannot be fixed for 3 months should we do the same thing?
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]