5 ms·

Considering the "muslim minorities" went on a wild random stabbing campaign and randomly injected people with some sort of syringes in public places, AND entry

Considering the "muslim minorities" went on a wild random stabbing campaign and randomly injected people with some sort of syringes in public places, AND entry into restaurands and stores all include metal detectors and xray scanners and armed troops are standing everywhere, I'd say there's already been a war declared by the minorities against the chinese there. Just in case you are wondering my wife has family who live in different parts of xinjiang. A couple of summers ago during the worst of it before all the above equipment was deployed many people were afraid to go outside their homes. I was talking with my wife this morning and other parts of western china (not xinjiang) have some issues with radicalization. The muslims have been on a non stop jihad since its inception and this is just a continuation of it. We could also go over what's been happening in the russian republics (like kazakhstan) which also have been feeling the effects of "invasion".

goodplay 9y ago
>Considering the "muslim minorities" went on a wild random stabbing campaign and randomly injected people with some sort of syringes in public places[...] What percentage of those "muslim minorities" actually took part in those acts? Does that percentage justify treating everyone who qualifies as "muslim minorities" like a criminal? > The muslims have been on a non stop jihad since its inception and this is just a continuation of it. That's not remotely true despite what extremists on both sides like to delude themselves into believing.
- hnbroseph 9y ago
  the majority of nazis were reasonable people. why treat nazis as a whole so poorly? the issue isn't 'percentage' of active agents, or 'supportive' agents. it's about ideologies with structural support for violence and oppression. > That's not remotely true how do you think islam spread historically? peaceful dialog over tea? a rather significant contribution was conquest and the 'education' of other people's children in the 'islamic worldview'.
praulv 9y ago
I cannot believe I am reading such utter claptrap on HN. So this is become the new Breitbart/Der Sturmer comments section? Then again, it didn't take me too long to look up your little gun obsession on reddit.

goodplay 9y ago

>Considering the "muslim minorities" went on a wild random stabbing campaign and randomly injected people with some sort of syringes in public places[...] What percentage of those "muslim minorities" actually took part in those acts? Does that percentage justify treating everyone who qualifies as "muslim minorities" like a criminal? > The muslims have been on a non stop jihad since its inception and this is just a continuation of it. That's not remotely true despite what extremists on both sides like to delude themselves into believing.

hnbroseph 9y ago
the majority of nazis were reasonable people. why treat nazis as a whole so poorly? the issue isn't 'percentage' of active agents, or 'supportive' agents. it's about ideologies with structural support for violence and oppression. > That's not remotely true how do you think islam spread historically? peaceful dialog over tea? a rather significant contribution was conquest and the 'education' of other people's children in the 'islamic worldview'.

praulv 9y ago

I cannot believe I am reading such utter claptrap on HN. So this is become the new Breitbart/Der Sturmer comments section? Then again, it didn't take me too long to look up your little gun obsession on reddit.