3 ms·
Current hires are not a fixed supply to be taken for granted. Hire someone else for a ton extra, refuse me a raise, and I'll leave. That is, if that informati
by RodericDay 9y ago
Current hires are not a fixed supply to be taken for granted.
Hire someone else for a ton extra, refuse me a raise, and I'll leave.
That is, if that information was available. Kinda convenient that it isn't, huh?
- drdaeman 9y ago> Hire someone else for a ton extra, refuse me a raise, and I'll leave. Hmm.... Wouldn't this inflate the economy? (Edit: seems that it doesn't, at least in Norway.) I assume there always will be the cases where someone is needed urgently, so such hires are unavoidable.
- phamilton 9y agoIt is absolutely convenient to be able to retain talent for as cheap as possible. Just like it is convenient to pit two suppliers against each other to drive costs down. Quitting because you don't get a raise doesn't change anything unless you have an alternative that will pay you more. In which case, that alternative is a negotiating piece independent of a coworkers salary. Long story short, have alternatives.
- syrrim 9y agoIf you leave, even if you are leaving to a worse salary, you are hurting the former company. If that company considers you to be worth whatever they're paying you (read: they can't find someone better for less) than they will give you the raise rather than let you go. All you need to know is the maximum amount they are willing to pay you, which you can then negotiate for.