3 ms·
One of the most fun theories I've heard came from a friend of mine. He believes Satoshi hasn't been found because there isn't a Satoshi, but rather that it was
by AdamSC1 9y ago
One of the most fun theories I've heard came from a friend of mine. He believes Satoshi hasn't been found because there isn't a Satoshi, but rather that it was a code name for a major research project.
Creating, designing and building the first version of Bitcoin is complicated and spans a number of fields of expertise.
Most of these fields of expertise only have a few truly exceptional practitioners who would be capable of the original thought.
You then have to factor in the peculiar nature of:
1) Not touching his new wealth of initial Bitcoins.
2) Disappearing into obscurity.
3) Being able to avoid being discovered (or nobody actually trying that hard to find him).
Occam's Razor principle would suggest all of that is less likely to have some altruistic single brilliant individual create Bitcoin and then leave. It's more likely a team of individuals would create it under a pseudonym, dissolve after completion of the project and then no longer have access to the accounts/keys.
Large government agencies would have the ability to bring top minds together, and less interest in liquidating the initial Satoshi Bitcoins.
Why would they want it? There are plenty of reasons governments would want a public ledger system. Unlike some of Bitcoin's spin-offs, Bitcoin isn't actually really private at all. It would be great for tracking and stopping crime.
Of course this is all a theory that sounds like it's out of a spy novel, but I think it's good fun.
The other likely possibilities is that Satoshi could have been older and passed away, or he truly is some brilliant mind who is well hidden.
- the_d00d 9y agoThe problem that I see with your theory is that it would be very difficult for so many people to keep this a secret.
- CM30 9y agoYeah, it falls into the problem conspiracy theories do. It's incredibly hard to keep a secret when it goes beyond one or two people, especially when what's being hidden is a major controversy or something a lot of people are interested in reading about. If it was a government project, it'd only take one leaker wanting some quick cash from the media to blow the whole thing.
- borplk 9y agoIf I was to bet I'd bet on it being a single exceptional individual who managed to keep it secret than a group of people keeping it secret. Anything beyond a single person massively increases the probability of a leak.