> The iPad measured at 6.2% lower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at 10.7% slower than print. Wait a minute here... 6.2% slow

> The iPad measured at 6.2% lower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at 10.7% slower than print. Wait a minute here... 6.2% slower is proven statistical significance, yet 4.2% slower is almost certainly random noise? Are all article writers mathematically and statistically illiterate?