I read that and said to myself "So....it WAS a vulnerability in Parity" The article stating that it wasn't a vulnerability with Parity AND THEN IMMEDIATELY AFT

I read that and said to myself "So....it WAS a vulnerability in Parity" The article stating that it wasn't a vulnerability with Parity AND THEN IMMEDIATELY AFTER stating it was a vulnerability with code distributed BY PARITY is throwing up all sorts of red flags with me. Like the Wizard of OZ with "There is nothing behind the curtain"