3 ms·
There's a theory[0][1] that it's mostly down to aesthetics. It looks visually more pleasing that way when split into three groups of four numbers: I, II, II
by ldjb 9y ago
There's a theory[0][1] that it's mostly down to aesthetics. It looks visually more pleasing that way when split into three groups of four numbers:
I, II, III, IIII (consisting of I only)
V, VI, VII, VIII (consisting of I and V)
IX, X, XI, XII (consisting of I and X)
[0] http://mathtourist.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/iiii-versus-iv-on-clocks.html http://mathtourist.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/iiii-versus-iv-on-...
[1] https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/encyclopaedia/glossary-of-watchmaking/s/roman-numeral-iiii-on-dials-1/ https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/encyclopaedia/glossary-of...
- sharpercoder 9y agoPersonally, I find distinguishing III and IIII quite hard in several fonts. However, the difference between [II and III] and [III and IV] is easier to read.