3 ms·
It's a fair point on the long-term cost of sexual harassment combined with an uncivilized, one-sided public accusation. Do I miss something here? Which part of
by fwn 9y ago
It's a fair point on the long-term cost of sexual harassment combined with an uncivilized, one-sided public accusation. Do I miss something here?
Which part of the argument could not have been made without ruining a reputation through TC reach? How far are those accusations confirmed?
I've no stake in any of those people and I am not particularly opinionated about the current cultural matters surrounding harassment, but this is not a very civil approach and I am not sure it does a favor for the cause of greater awareness on the issue.
- bookmarkacc 9y agoSexual harassment is not a very civil approach either. She states that she was inspired to share her experience (with photographic evidence) base on accounts of other women coming forward in a similiar manner.
- fwn 9y agoMy criticism was meant to be valid irrespective of the actual accusations quality. The concern would still stand for the accusation of more serious crimes like rape, murder, genocide, etc. Being inspired to skip the trial and personally decide to put somebody in the pillory is an understandable, but deeply flawed motivation. The author can, of course, make every accusation. The publication however should not make the crime appear to be a secured fact. Breaching the journalistic objectivity might be a current trend but is intellectually dishonest and no service to the cause. This looks more like vigilantism than a serious conversation.