The article authors' headline "Why Finland’s Basic Income Experiment Isn’t Working" is misleading. It suggests that they are commenting on information about how

The article authors' headline "Why Finland’s Basic Income Experiment Isn’t Working" is misleading. It suggests that they are commenting on information about how the experiment is going. Instead, they criticize only the trial's approach, which was known before it began. There is a comment about the sample size having been reduced to a fifth of the original proposal. But my previous sentence is the entire content in the article relating to how the experiment is going. Everything else in the article is commentary about the original proposal and unrelated to the experiment's progress.