3 ms·
Nothing was stolen. All I see is a programmer abiding by the contracts.
by gciruelos 9y ago
Nothing was stolen. All I see is a programmer abiding by the contracts.
- LoSboccacc 9y ago.. and this wasn't even the first time. And this is all by design.
- 13of40 9y agoFrom Intel's perspective, everything went perfectly.
- onion2k 9y agoIn legal terms you'd need to make the argument that the programmer abided by the letter of the contract rather than the spirit of the contract. That might well be a reasonable defence in the case of smart contracts, but it'd need to be tested in a court.
- isolli 9y agoHas a contract been signed in any legal sense?
- Fej 9y agoIf a smart contract is also a binding, legal contract, then normal contract law applies - and intent matters here in the real world. Therefore, it's theft. I am most certainly not a lawyer.
- learc83 9y agoMost likely true. But if intent matters and the smart contract isn't actually the final arbitar, then smart contracts are fatally flawed. Unless courts recognize the ability to sign away your rights through some kind of disclaimer that makes the smart contract the equivalent of binding arbitration.