3 ms·
Judge: Glassdoor reviews aren’t “political,” so feds can grab user identities
- lsiebert 9y agoExamining some linked documents from pacer by the lawyer, Levy who brought this up, and searching glass door leads me to believe that TriWest Healthcare Alliance is the company in question. It has offices in Phoenix, and works with veterans 1. Restraino, who glassdoor wrote a letter to that the judge mentions, is AUSA of arizona. https://www.citizen.org/system/files/case_documents/orderdenyingglassdoormotiontoquash.pdf https://www.citizen.org/system/files/case_documents/orderden... 2. Page 9 of the following partially quotes an anonymous review https://www.citizen.org/system/files/case_documents/glassdoormotiontoquash.pdf https://www.citizen.org/system/files/case_documents/glassdoo... 3. Here is that anonymous review https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-TriWest-Healthcare-Alliance-RVW8783174.htm https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-TriWest-He... 4. the 125 reviews from september 2008 until the beginning of march match up to the numbers and dates of reviews given. Passed this to a journalist friend of mine. On further review, looks like the WSJ posted this already. http://webreprints.djreprints.com/4130891146141.html http://webreprints.djreprints.com/4130891146141.html
- DarkKomunalec 9y agoIgnoring the ridiculous notion that 1st Amendment implications apply more to 'political' speech, criticizing companies is political - you'd have to ignore the entire labour movement, and companies' involvement in politics, to think otherwise.