4 ms·
That seems like a pedantic and pointless distinction. No one thinks that your financial adviser is obliged to deposit embezzled funds into your accounts in ord
by dpark 9y ago
That seems like a pedantic and pointless distinction. No one thinks that your financial adviser is obliged to deposit embezzled funds into your accounts in order to meet his fiduciary duties to you. Obviously some obligations take priority.
The fiduciary duty of board members to shareholders still seems to be mostly about maximizing shareholder value.
- Symmetry 9y agoBut the point is that that while the fiduciary can't try to profit at the expense of the shareholders at all, they can trade off the interests of the shareholders against that of the employees as a group, the environment, their integrity, common morality, etc.