3 ms·
Hair isn't DNA. The tests done on it are comparative afaik. In fact, in the linked article it says that DNA exonerated people tried based on hair comparison –
by codezero 9y ago
Hair isn't DNA. The tests done on it are comparative afaik.
In fact, in the linked article it says that DNA exonerated people tried based on hair comparison – 25% of those exonerated to boot. Sounds like DNA is great.
What you seem to have a problem with, which is valid, is procedures, how evidence is introduced, and how the authority/validity of that evidence is communicated to the court, correct me if I'm wrong.