3 ms·
Maybe, then they should say so, indirectly better for me. But bugs and vulnerabilities? On a years old, widely tested and used "static" (or almost "static" ) p
by jaclaz 9y ago
Maybe, then they should say so, indirectly better for me.
But bugs and vulnerabilities?
On a years old, widely tested and used "static" (or almost "static" ) product?
How many possible ones they are introducing by completely changing the tool to be on the "cloud"?
- tedmiston 9y agoIt's not a static product even if the feature set is relatively static. Take a look at their Mac app changelog for instance. https://app-updates.agilebits.com/product_history/OPM4 https://app-updates.agilebits.com/product_history/OPM4
- heartbreak 9y ago1Password had vulnerabilities disclosed by Tavis Ormandy within the last year regarding the communication between the application and the browser extension. Those vulnerabilities were part of the so-called "static" product, and were not related to the new cloud functionality. [0] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=888 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=88...
- jaclaz 9y agoYes, I wasn't saying that the one had not bugs, all software may have some of them, I was only saying that the risks of introducing more, new ones when changing completely a software (or rewriting it) are bigger.