3 ms·
I just have an adblocker. Don't know how much better it looks for you, but this one looks great over here and I don't get to be the guy in every other HN post c
by mixedCase 9y ago
I just have an adblocker. Don't know how much better it looks for you, but this one looks great over here and I don't get to be the guy in every other HN post complaining a site doesn't work with JS disabled.
It doesn't seem to me that JS by itself is the issue here.
- stephengillie 9y agoI just have JS disabled (whitelisting sites I do use) and the article displays cleanly and with no ads. It's not like JavaScript is some virus or moral hazard. It's a tool, to be used when it's helpful, and discarded when it hinders. Like everything, the ability to execute JavaScript is a tool I use to get what I want.