5 ms·

I was thinking about buying an iPhone 4.0 when I qualify for an upgrade later this month, but given all of the issues with the antenna doesn't it seem like they

I was thinking about buying an iPhone 4.0 when I qualify for an upgrade later this month, but given all of the issues with the antenna doesn't it seem like they're going to release an upgraded version of the hardware in a relatively short peroid of time?

ttol 16y ago
the antenna issue seems like it indeed is software and really a non-issue. the "feature" to show 50% of signals as 5 bars was introduced in OS 2.1 update back in '08. Here is a graphic to showcase that: http://fscked.co.uk/post/754590440/this-infographic-hopefully-shows-that-im-not http://fscked.co.uk/post/754590440/this-infographic-hopefull... The fix is to undo that hard-coded reality distortion field into AT&T's recommended formula. In this case, AT&T isn't the bad guy as it seems like apple was trying to show their phones had better signal by misrepresenting the strength. The other, IMHO bigger, issue is the proximity sensor. To me, that's a NEW issue, and needs to be addressed (hopefully by software patch), since I've had issues with 100% of my calls.
- ZeroGravitas 16y ago
  Is there any evidence either way on whether the proximity sensors problems are hardware or software in nature, and if they're hardware problems whether they can be worked around in software?
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]
- rodh257 16y ago
  but what does any of this have to do with the fact the signal goes down when you hold the phone in a certain way? whether it drops from 4 to 2 bars or 2 to 1 based on whatever algorithm they had surely doesn't change the fact that it is still going down?
  - ttol 16y ago
    it goes down because if you're at the floor of that green bar (that fills up half the range), and then you put your hand over it, you cross the threshold and it looks like a dramatic decrease. what should happen, most likely with other phones, is that the range should be evenly distributed so that a drop in 1 bar is a drop in 1 bar. because iPhone 4's distribution is weighted/biased towards the top half of the spectrum, it fails when you cross the threshold. This "feature" seems like it was introduced in OS 2.1 back in '08. You also can't avoid drops in signal when putting your hand over it -- this happens with every phone. just iphone's visual representation algorithm makes it seem far worst than it really is, and they will fix the way it displays in the next version. EDIT: Why the downvote? Gruber even stated that the issue is the introduction of the biased bar meter. The exposure of the antenna just highlights the issue when you're at the threshold between 5 bars and "other".
    - tlack 16y ago
      What you're saying does not make sense when you consider that this didn't happen with the previous iPhone.
      - ttol 16y ago
        If you read the blogs and apple's own letter, it does in fact happen with previous iPhones. EDIT: again, why the downvote? To quote apple's letter: "To start with, gripping almost any mobile phone in certain ways will reduce its reception by 1 or more bars. This is true of iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, as well as many Droid, Nokia and RIM phones." "..this mistake has been present since the original iPhone"
        deleted 16y ago
        [deleted]
        kenjackson 16y ago
        But this doesn't happen to the same degre as the iPhone 4. The iPhone 4's antennae placement makes this happen with a relatively standard hand position. I've tried this on a Pre and EVO, and I can't get either to do it, although I'm sure there must be some hand position where it happens -- but it shouldn't be one of the most common hand positions.
- masklinn 16y ago
  > the antenna issue seems like it indeed is software and really a non-issue Incorrect. Read the text on the page you linked to and the original Anandtech article: the iPhone 4 loses almost 20dB of signal when holding it naturally in your hand, without using a case. By comparison, a Nexus One loses about 10dB, and the 3GS loses about 3dB.
  - ttol 16y ago
    Yea, the iPhone 4 loses more signal than others due to antenna being on outside. But real world performance shows it still outperforms 3GS/other phones. Other parts of the Anandtech show that iPhone 4's sensitivity is greater.
jsz0 16y ago
You get a 30 day return period with AT&T or Apple. That's the part of this story that has never jived with me. If lots of people are having this problem we should be seeing lines at AT&T and Apple stores for people waiting to return their phones and, as far as I know, we're not.
- ttol 16y ago
  I didn't do a return because of the antenna issue. I did do an exchange because of the proximity sensor issue though. And, the replacement phone still has the problem. All my calls get are affected by this. Randomly detects my face as input and initiates facetime, puts calls on hold, randomly tries to SMS people, or just ends the call. The real issue is the proximity sensor as that is a bug killing calls now.
- flogic 16y ago
  I'm not an iPhone user but I imagine most people would just suck it up and get a case. All the other options tend to suck more.
- xenophanes 16y ago
  If the iPhone does 95% of what they want, and they return it, now they get 0% of what they wanted (and they can go buy some other phone and get 80%). What they really want is Apple to improve it, that's their best outcome.

ttol 16y ago

the antenna issue seems like it indeed is software and really a non-issue. the "feature" to show 50% of signals as 5 bars was introduced in OS 2.1 update back in '08. Here is a graphic to showcase that: http://fscked.co.uk/post/754590440/this-infographic-hopefully-shows-that-im-not http://fscked.co.uk/post/754590440/this-infographic-hopefull... The fix is to undo that hard-coded reality distortion field into AT&T's recommended formula. In this case, AT&T isn't the bad guy as it seems like apple was trying to show their phones had better signal by misrepresenting the strength. The other, IMHO bigger, issue is the proximity sensor. To me, that's a NEW issue, and needs to be addressed (hopefully by software patch), since I've had issues with 100% of my calls.

ZeroGravitas 16y ago
Is there any evidence either way on whether the proximity sensors problems are hardware or software in nature, and if they're hardware problems whether they can be worked around in software?
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
rodh257 16y ago
but what does any of this have to do with the fact the signal goes down when you hold the phone in a certain way? whether it drops from 4 to 2 bars or 2 to 1 based on whatever algorithm they had surely doesn't change the fact that it is still going down?
- ttol 16y ago
  it goes down because if you're at the floor of that green bar (that fills up half the range), and then you put your hand over it, you cross the threshold and it looks like a dramatic decrease. what should happen, most likely with other phones, is that the range should be evenly distributed so that a drop in 1 bar is a drop in 1 bar. because iPhone 4's distribution is weighted/biased towards the top half of the spectrum, it fails when you cross the threshold. This "feature" seems like it was introduced in OS 2.1 back in '08. You also can't avoid drops in signal when putting your hand over it -- this happens with every phone. just iphone's visual representation algorithm makes it seem far worst than it really is, and they will fix the way it displays in the next version. EDIT: Why the downvote? Gruber even stated that the issue is the introduction of the biased bar meter. The exposure of the antenna just highlights the issue when you're at the threshold between 5 bars and "other".
  - tlack 16y ago
    What you're saying does not make sense when you consider that this didn't happen with the previous iPhone.
    - ttol 16y ago
      If you read the blogs and apple's own letter, it does in fact happen with previous iPhones. EDIT: again, why the downvote? To quote apple's letter: "To start with, gripping almost any mobile phone in certain ways will reduce its reception by 1 or more bars. This is true of iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, as well as many Droid, Nokia and RIM phones." "..this mistake has been present since the original iPhone"
      - deleted 16y ago
        [deleted]
      - kenjackson 16y ago
        But this doesn't happen to the same degre as the iPhone 4. The iPhone 4's antennae placement makes this happen with a relatively standard hand position. I've tried this on a Pre and EVO, and I can't get either to do it, although I'm sure there must be some hand position where it happens -- but it shouldn't be one of the most common hand positions.
masklinn 16y ago
> the antenna issue seems like it indeed is software and really a non-issue Incorrect. Read the text on the page you linked to and the original Anandtech article: the iPhone 4 loses almost 20dB of signal when holding it naturally in your hand, without using a case. By comparison, a Nexus One loses about 10dB, and the 3GS loses about 3dB.
- ttol 16y ago
  Yea, the iPhone 4 loses more signal than others due to antenna being on outside. But real world performance shows it still outperforms 3GS/other phones. Other parts of the Anandtech show that iPhone 4's sensitivity is greater.

jsz0 16y ago

You get a 30 day return period with AT&T or Apple. That's the part of this story that has never jived with me. If lots of people are having this problem we should be seeing lines at AT&T and Apple stores for people waiting to return their phones and, as far as I know, we're not.

ttol 16y ago
I didn't do a return because of the antenna issue. I did do an exchange because of the proximity sensor issue though. And, the replacement phone still has the problem. All my calls get are affected by this. Randomly detects my face as input and initiates facetime, puts calls on hold, randomly tries to SMS people, or just ends the call. The real issue is the proximity sensor as that is a bug killing calls now.
flogic 16y ago
I'm not an iPhone user but I imagine most people would just suck it up and get a case. All the other options tend to suck more.
xenophanes 16y ago
If the iPhone does 95% of what they want, and they return it, now they get 0% of what they wanted (and they can go buy some other phone and get 80%). What they really want is Apple to improve it, that's their best outcome.