4 ms·
That cop should get the same punishment that he tried to foist on the innocent man. The level of crime we tolerate from "law enforcement" is astonishing. Why
by mcbobbington 9y ago
That cop should get the same punishment that he tried to foist on the innocent man.
The level of crime we tolerate from "law enforcement" is astonishing. Why do people no longer care about justice?
- justadeveloper2 9y agoIt was all explained extremely well in "Team America: World Police."
- cpncrunch 9y ago>tried to foist on the innocent man I'm not sure if that's the case. The article seems to be saying that they did actually find the drugs in the alley, and the officer was essentially recreating the finding of the drugs using his body camera. Obviously that isn't an acceptable way of using the body camera, and it has the unfortunate effect of causing the case of a potentially guilty drug-dealer to be dropped.
- jdenning 9y agoAnother way of saying "recreating the finding of the drugs using his body camera" is "falsifying evidence". Edit: In the US, people are innocent until proven guilty.
- calvano915 9y agoWhy wouldn't the initial search be conducted with the body cam on? This is falsifying evidence, whether the person was guilty or not.
- cpncrunch 9y agoPresumably because he didn't know they were going to find anything. We already know he didn't know about the 30 second thing. If he did, it wouldn't have been a problem, he wouldn't have needed to do the recreation at all. I'm saying it was possibly illegal but not amoral. There is a difference. Compare to planting drugs to frame someone innocent.