3 ms·
Your cohort point is particularly insightful. I had just started my career in 1999 .. I had a bad feeling about the situation and went to grad school right away
by throwawaybbq1 9y ago
Your cohort point is particularly insightful. I had just started my career in 1999 .. I had a bad feeling about the situation and went to grad school right away (after a year). Was a good move at the time because a year or two after I started, good programs had a crazy number of applicants (which of course, raises the bar to get in). Other than the grad school crowd and people who braved unemployment, what did these professionals do? Get out of tech completely?
Btw ... love the hn handle :)
- johngalt 9y agoYes in many cases they got out of tech. One of the nice things about tech careers is that your floor is most other people's ceiling. Having tech skills in the early 2000s created a large gap between you and other office workers. Imagine if being able to read/write was a rare skill. It would make you generally competitive in many areas, because you could learn and communicate better than your peers. I went into banking because I already knew a few people in the field and they were desperate for people. Did really well, set a bunch of performance records, put on track for various promotions/advancement. Strongly considered never returning to tech despite it being my passion. Eventually I couldn't stay away from tech, but it took some time. It also discouraged many new students from entering CS programs. This is why the 'talent shortage' lasted so long. It wasn't just a mass exodus of existing tech pros, but also a sharp decline in people pursuing tech careers. The high school class of 2002-2004 was much less likely to consider pursuing a tech degree. This is the reason you can't find piles of skilled/cheap early career programmers with 5 years experience in 2012. That means they would have graduated in 2007 and selected their undergrad program in 2002-2003.