3 ms·
Unfortunately, one of the important citations ([5], "Proof of Replication") does not appear to be available. (Or, at least, Google cannot find it.)
by agl 9y ago
Unfortunately, one of the important citations ([5], "Proof of Replication") does not appear to be available. (Or, at least, Google cannot find it.)
- woah 9y agoTo my non expert eye it appears that the Sybil resistance and hence the entire novelty of the paper is rests on this currently inaccessible citation.
- Taek 9y agoCitations 14 and 15 also seem to be unpublished, and are all by the same authors. Seems like important sections of this paper were not ready in time for them to perform their ICO.
- Kubuxu 9y agoYes, citations 5, 14, 15 will be published latter. There is a possibility that some of them will be published next week.
- ardivekar 9y agoAt least upload a preprint to arXiv or something. What's the point of citing a paper that doesn't exist yet?
- _prometheus 9y agoIt's coming shortly (days), it's a WIP that needs significant polish, but the core result is there.
- sigmagerta 9y agois this expected to magically resolve the problem of storing raw data and computing proofs lazily?