4 ms·
> It is not an anonymous publication! So who wrote this? You say it's "based on a paper" written by known authors, but did they write this publication? Why not
by freyir 9y ago
> It is not an anonymous publication!
So who wrote this? You say it's "based on a paper" written by known authors, but did they write this publication? Why not put their names not on it? Or did a representative write it, as you suggest? We don't know. It's anonymous.
> The blog's "journal" name is misleading
The usage seems similar to that of "Bell Labs Technical Journal" or "Lincoln Laboratory Journal."
- denzil_correa 9y ago> You say it's "based on a paper" written by known authors, but did they write this publication? I'm confused - for me the answer is quite obvious. The authors listed on the CVPR paper wrote the published paper or are you suggesting otherwise?
- freyir 9y agoThat's how it seems, but OP suggested it was written by a communications department. I'm not sure. Why leave out the authors' names?
- nl 9y agoThe question is who is the author of this post. It is unattributed, and while clearly based on the CVPR it is different enough that if it were a traditional publication it would be counted separately. If someone wanted to cite this post, what would they cite? By comparison, distil.pub is a properly citable journal: https://distill.pub/2017/momentum/#citation https://distill.pub/2017/momentum/#citation