3 ms·
What I was referring to was the proportionality, obviously it IS being discussed (I linked a prominent policy maker discussing it), so really what I'm saying is
by gooseus 9y ago
What I was referring to was the proportionality, obviously it IS being discussed (I linked a prominent policy maker discussing it), so really what I'm saying is that the amount of airtime/attention given to stories on the opioid crisis was far less than the combined number of stories attending to gun crimes or self-driving car successes/failures.
I remember seeing a Vanguard episode on the "pain management" industry in Florida called the Oxycontin Express [1] back in 2009 (won a Peabody). And yet it's only in the last year or so that I've actually heard about it being addressed more publicly.
If you're telling me that I'm wrong and that actually more people, dollars, and attention are going toward saving people from opioid overdose than automobile accidents and gun crime, then I would be happy to be wrong and would want to see numbers.
Otherwise it sounds like you're telling me to tune my news inputs so I hear stories in a proportion that would please me better?
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZEvXNqzkM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZEvXNqzkM
- aaronbrethorst 9y ago"isn't being talked about or addressed proportional to other societal issues" Talked about, from my perspective, it is. Addressed, no, it most certainly is not being addressed.