Despite that clarification, there were fraudulent claims made and fraud performed. As a critical piece, it's both informative and outrageous in content. If ther

Despite that clarification, there were fraudulent claims made and fraud performed. As a critical piece, it's both informative and outrageous in content. If there was any interest in reform, it would be damning. The FCC's modus is that minimizing the negative press about today's problems matters more than the lobbied outcomes. This will not even be a footnote on wikipedia in 2 decades...if there is still a wikipedia that has an FCC (tm) article.