3 ms·
I don't see how you differ from what I wrote. The start of the thread was the claim that the Durbin amendment made it illegal for merchants to set CC minimums
by DrScump 9y ago
I don't see how you differ from what I wrote.
The start of the thread was the claim that the Durbin amendment made it illegal for merchants to set CC minimums for consumer purchases. That's the false interpretation.
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoWhat I originally wrote is easily verifiable and clearly does not say that: > the law requires that processors allow merchants to have a minimum purchase requirement of up to $10
- DrScump 9y agoI give up. You refuse to see the distinction between the processor-merchant relationship and the merchant-consumer relationship.
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoNo, I'm really don't. My original comment is about the processor-merchant relationship. You can tell because it uses the word "processor" and "merchant" and is about what the processor allows the merchant to do.