4 ms·
That sounds like it was unworkable in Firefox. Maybe FF just isn't a very good browser? You can be standards-compliant while implementing the standards with pe
by fixermark 9y ago
That sounds like it was unworkable in Firefox.
Maybe FF just isn't a very good browser? You can be standards-compliant while implementing the standards with performance problems and ugly corner-cases.
- kuschku 9y agoIt works in Firefox. Always has. Change the UA, and it just works. This is the same story as when Google made Inbox a "Chrome-Exclusive" that also didn’t run in Safari, Opera, or even fucking Chromium. It’s just anticompetitiveness.
- IncRnd 9y ago> It’s just anticompetitiveness. I find it interesting how a word's proper usage is in a case that it's opposite would work better! Anticompetitive is the right word in your sentence, of course, but google isn't anti-competitive in this case with firefox. It is ultra-competitive!