2 ms·
You don't negotiate in a vacuum. If you participate in writing that algorithm that exerts downward pressure on salaries generally (because it's more efficient/
by fatbird 9y ago
You don't negotiate in a vacuum. If you participate in writing that algorithm that exerts downward pressure on salaries generally (because it's more efficient/effective, and it's applied at the level of a tech behemoth with a lot of influence), you're incrementally lowering the baseline from which you and everyone else negotiate. You're basically arming the other side of the negotiating table--and that other side is already a multi-billion dollar unicorn.
At some point, you'd think a basic sense of self-interest would remain. I swear, if someone held a contest to design a better rope for hanging engineers, we'd fall all over ourselves trying to win. If someone kickstarted that idea, they'd need new stretch goals in an hour.
- Anderkent 9y agoIt might be more efficient/effective, or it might just be more predictable and cheaper to run than person-to-person negotiations. I think I'd prefer a clear algorithm for salaries to "what you get depends on who your lead is and how much of an asshole you're willing to be".