3 ms·
are you considering caloric efficiency? I love this list, but I doubt it's accurate to more than an factor of 2. http://efficiencyiseverything.com/calorie-per-
by ouid 9y ago
are you considering caloric efficiency?
I love this list, but I doubt it's accurate to more than an factor of 2. http://efficiencyiseverything.com/calorie-per-dollar-list/ http://efficiencyiseverything.com/calorie-per-dollar-list/
Bananas are not a cost effective source of calories, have very little protein, and boast a fairly high glycemic index.
basically, bananas are trash at being fruit.
- deepGem 9y agoValid. Bananas are however very high in potassium, moderately high in Magnesium and dietary fiber.
- Johnny_Brahms 9y agoFirst of all, this is discussion about people eating too many calories from bad food. Bananas probably beat most of the snacks otherwise discussed. And protein deficiency? A 70kg male needs something like 55g of protein (WHO figures) unless they exercise. You are not going to go below that unless you fill a substantial chunk of your calorie intake by eating pure fat. I eat a plant based diet and weigh about 67kg. On 2500kcal I get about 95-110g of protein, and that is without trying. Had I been a meat/milk eater, this number would have been higher. Protein intake is generally a problems if you are either starving or very serious about building LOTS ofta muscle.