3 ms·
> If you can't afford California, or you don't want a 2 hour commute with a $180,000 salary, then DO NOT LIVE THERE. It's that simple. This is great advice, it
by jdoliner 9y ago
> If you can't afford California, or you don't want a 2 hour commute with a $180,000 salary, then DO NOT LIVE THERE. It's that simple.
This is great advice, it really is that simple. You have very little voice in California but you have plenty of exit.
> The issue with a place like California is that there are almost always going to be more people that want to live there, than there is space.
This doesn't seem quite as obviously true to me. While there's lots of people who want to live in California, along with all it's other bountiful resources California has a lot of space. We could, in theory, house many more millions of people before we really started hitting true space limits. It's not infinite of course, but the resources are very underutilized right now. Or at least they appear to be to my eyes.
- muninn_ 9y agoI mean, if developers plan right, you could add people in a more efficient manner, but good luck bulldozing the suburbs and getting rid of cars. Those are the main issues. It's not so much that I don't believe it is possible, I don't think there is the will for the people of California to give up their cars, and their suburbs for Tokyo-style living. I strongly believe that California needs far fewer people, and more efficient/better housing. I don't think more people + more housing is a sustainable solution. Of course this isn't the popular narrative, but I think it's true.