4 ms·
If there were no zoning regulations, you are absolutely right...and this would've resolved itself long ago. But there are strong zoning and property rights at
by bkohlmann 9y ago
If there were no zoning regulations, you are absolutely right...and this would've resolved itself long ago. But there are strong zoning and property rights at play. I'm very libertarian, and was priced out of the Bay Area (recently left grad school for Texas), but I'm actually sympathetic to the homeowners there who are using democratic means (i.e. their elected city reps) to support their interests. Society (in the form of the state government) could upend the property rights they are leveraging...but that would have significant incentive repercussions down the line. It would greatly weaken property rights...which is a foundation of Western society. There are far deeper, and interesting, issues aside from mere housing stock.
- xxpor 9y agoZoning is the exact opposite of property rights. It restricts what you're allowed to do.
- AnimalMuppet 9y agoIt's both/and, not either/or. It gives me the right to not have to live next to an oil refinery, at the price of prohibiting my next-door-neighbors from putting an oil refinery on their place.
- ouid 9y agowhat about the people using democratic means to strip homeowners of the "right" to prevent development? It sounds like your ideology is pretty scattershot. Aren't libertarianism and democracy fundamentally opposed ideologies anyway?