4 ms·
Imho non-pure is probably ok. Haskell's purity is probably what destroyed any chance of it growing popular enough to have a healthy ecosystem of libraries and c
by nnq 9y ago
Imho non-pure is probably ok. Haskell's purity is probably what destroyed any chance of it growing popular enough to have a healthy ecosystem of libraries and community.
Anyway, since this has no memory management, neither rust-like nor gc, this is not in the niche I care about now, so moving on...
But again, great work. "Strict Haskell" with good C++ interop and decent records is awesome.