4 ms·

I'm done here. At the heart of it all, you want me to prove that Capitalism isn't the best economic model because you fancy this extremely primitive means of s

by tomlin 16y ago

I'm done here. At the heart of it all, you want me to prove that Capitalism isn't the best economic model because you fancy this extremely primitive means of sharing resources. That's fine. You seem rigid and embarrassingly religious when it comes to the idea of market innovation. When you say, You are asserting that capitalism is not an ideal system but you are not backing up that assertion., you're essentially saying that evolution in markets/systems doesn't exist. You want me to prove that evolution exists. Research and opinion is almost always temporary; as our world changes everyday, so does the research. Have ideas, not beliefs and allow them to evolve.

tkahn6 16y ago
At the heart of it all, you want me to prove that Capitalism isn't the best economic model because you fancy this extremely primitive means of sharing resources. That's fine. My god. Are you aware that you are the one with a near-religious anti-capitalist opinion? Just read the statement above. You're already convinced of the inviability of capitalism and so no argument will convince you otherwise. You're an idiot. Not because we disagree about whether capitalism is a viable economic system or not, but because you continue to argue with me over it and by your own admission you are ignorant and continue to remain ignorant about these matters. Your opinions about economics are purely emotional and based on hearsay. I have never said whether or not I think pure capitalism is the ideal economic system. My point all along has been that for you to say it is "beneath us as a society" is an empty statement because you haven't studied this at all. "We need something better." How can you say that when you don't even understand a single economic school of thought? I'm done too. This is really frustrating. I don't care if you agree or disagree with me about the viability of pure capitalism, but I can't even have an intelligent discussion with you.

by tomlin 16y ago

tkahn6 16y ago

At the heart of it all, you want me to prove that Capitalism isn't the best economic model because you fancy this extremely primitive means of sharing resources. That's fine. My god. Are you aware that you are the one with a near-religious anti-capitalist opinion? Just read the statement above. You're already convinced of the inviability of capitalism and so no argument will convince you otherwise. You're an idiot. Not because we disagree about whether capitalism is a viable economic system or not, but because you continue to argue with me over it and by your own admission you are ignorant and continue to remain ignorant about these matters. Your opinions about economics are purely emotional and based on hearsay. I have never said whether or not I think pure capitalism is the ideal economic system. My point all along has been that for you to say it is "beneath us as a society" is an empty statement because you haven't studied this at all. "We need something better." How can you say that when you don't even understand a single economic school of thought? I'm done too. This is really frustrating. I don't care if you agree or disagree with me about the viability of pure capitalism, but I can't even have an intelligent discussion with you.