4 ms·

"A simple legal remedy would be a “ Blade Runner” law that makes it illegal to deploy any program that hides its real identity to pose as a human. Automated pro

"A simple legal remedy would be a “ Blade Runner” law that makes it illegal to deploy any program that hides its real identity to pose as a human. Automated processes should be required to state, “I am a robot.” When dealing with a fake human, it would be nice to know." what a genius idea. there's no way at all that could be used against people except for spammers

sk0g 9y ago
But what if the blade runners are also bots, and mistakenly ban humans? Who would you blame? Silly idea altogether. The robots.txt is as close to this as we should go.
jayrhynas 9y ago
And where do you draw the line? If you schedule a tweet to be sent in the future, is that a "bot"? And how to you make sure APIs aren't being used by bots - do you force users of 3rd party apps to enter a 1st party captcha to refresh their session every day?
- dublinben 9y ago
  Twitter already identifies what app was used to post a tweet, if you're looking through the API not their app. It would be trivial to display that information and distinguish between apps sent by humans and by automated programs.
  - jayrhynas 9y ago
    Sure, but then you're either pushing the responsibility on twitter to monitor how every API key they give out is used and label certain apps as bots, or on the user to look up an app and determine for themselves if it's a human or a bot.
Grangar 9y ago
How would you even enforce that though.
- jpalomaki 9y ago
  Compare to the no-spam rules. They don't stop people from spamming, but since that thing is illegal, it can be investigated by the police and people/companies found breaking the rules can be punished.
dkersten 9y ago
Indeed. "If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns" seems to apply here too. If anything, it will make it easier to impersonate a human, because people will assume that if it doesn't self-identify as a bot, it must be a human.

sk0g 9y ago

But what if the blade runners are also bots, and mistakenly ban humans? Who would you blame? Silly idea altogether. The robots.txt is as close to this as we should go.

jayrhynas 9y ago

And where do you draw the line? If you schedule a tweet to be sent in the future, is that a "bot"? And how to you make sure APIs aren't being used by bots - do you force users of 3rd party apps to enter a 1st party captcha to refresh their session every day?

dublinben 9y ago
Twitter already identifies what app was used to post a tweet, if you're looking through the API not their app. It would be trivial to display that information and distinguish between apps sent by humans and by automated programs.
- jayrhynas 9y ago
  Sure, but then you're either pushing the responsibility on twitter to monitor how every API key they give out is used and label certain apps as bots, or on the user to look up an app and determine for themselves if it's a human or a bot.

Grangar 9y ago

How would you even enforce that though.

jpalomaki 9y ago
Compare to the no-spam rules. They don't stop people from spamming, but since that thing is illegal, it can be investigated by the police and people/companies found breaking the rules can be punished.

dkersten 9y ago

Indeed. "If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns" seems to apply here too. If anything, it will make it easier to impersonate a human, because people will assume that if it doesn't self-identify as a bot, it must be a human.